Democrats Need a Destination

Well, the Republicans have finally sunk far enough in the polls that they might actually lose the next presidential election.   

I said “might.”

Democrats are crowing and strutting, but in my opinion they should tone it down and do some deep thinking. 

You’re always in a risky spot if your political prospects are based on how badly the other guys have fucked up.  And the Democrats have special cause to worry because look at what the Republicans had to do before they lost enough support to actually risk losing an election. Polls say two-thirds of the American people have now turned against them, but that means one-third are still for.  And yes, I kinow, there’s hardly anyone so corrupt, dishonest, incompetent and venal that someone doesn’t think “You’re a doing a heckuva’ job, Brownie.”  But still: I mean look at their record

Cheating their way to power.   Plunging this country into a ruinous and unnecessary war. Lying to get us into it.  Exposing one of our own intelligence agents to intimidate critics. Sending America’s soldiers out there without body armor–telling them, “If you want it, buy it yourself.”  Profiteering off the war. Bringing the dead home on commercial flights as “freight” to save money.  Putting the wounded into hospitals like Walter Reed.  Seeking (and getting) the authority to torture. Using that authority to…well…torture.  Operating an international gulag of secret prisons. Wiretapping American citizens illegally. Attempting to use the justice department to hound political opponents and protect friends from criminal prosecution. This list goes on. And on.  How could these guys have any supporters at all outside a fringe of extremist loonies in need of medication?

To put it another way: what are they doing right? There must be something. We could stay here all night listing their trangressions and shortcomings. What’s on the other side of the ledger?

I think I know.  It’s the vision thing. Granted, the current administration is running on the fumes of the vision the Republicans used to have. And granted, the vision they used to have was repulsive (to me at least). The fact remains: for years and years , people were boarding the Republican train because it announced a destination. It was, at least, going somewhere. Republican electoral success from the 1970s into the oughts shows that it’s better to have a crummy vision than no vision at all, better to be going somewhere than nowhere in particular. 

What does this add up to?  Hey, I’m not saying the Democrats should cobble together a bad vision in preference to none at all.  I don’t see why the choice should be “bad” or “none”. They should forge a humane and noble vision, a sense of some grand and mythic destination for the whole society, a project that all who board the Democratic train will be joining–that’s the task Democrats should be undertaking now. 

Oh wait–I’m a Democrat. I guess that means me: I should get going on this task. And I’m trying, I am. So should we all.  Let’s quit complaining that we can’t come up with a charismatic, electable leader.  The problem isn’t our lack of leaders. Our lack of leaders is a sympto9m o fthe problem.  Leaders don’t make movements; movements make leaders, and a movement is the thing we don’t have right now.

 

2 Comments so far

  1. Hector Martinez May 28th, 2007 12:29 pm

    Tamim,

    Your essay is powerful. It hits between the eyes. You summed up Republican “culture of corrupt ” very well If I had to give some credit to Republican policy, it would be their attempt to be noble. As for Democrats,I don’t have very much confidence in them in turning the tide of this present gloomly American mood.
    You might add to the Republican misdeeds, Sec of Defense Rumsfeld using a name stamp on letters to families of troops killed in action. Vice President Cheney having a secret( public does not need to know) meeting with top enegry CEO’s. Opposing stem cell research to protect the “sanctity of life” while the blood bath in Iraq continues on a daily basis. Putting our stretched out Armed forces in danger by forcing two to three combat tours on our troops. The last statement concerning our troops leads me to conclude ” Never go to war with a voluteer Army ”

    Hector Martinez

    Note: Please refrain from using the f word in your future writings.Leave that word to those awful rappers.

  2. Deena August 20th, 2007 12:04 pm

    My memory of the past is a bit shaky, on account of having been a child at the time, but I seem to recall democratic canditates with a vision. Certainly Gore had one. He had a vision for an ecologically friendly country, one that he had stood by and advocated for years. Also, some of the primary candidates of ‘04, particularly Dean, seemed to have some fiery appeal, if not vision, but they were not elected. I don’t think the problem is vision so much as presentation. To sell a vision to enough voters without alienating too many others, you need and appeal to people’s baser ideals without addressing anything meaningful. If you have a real vision, with real complexities, explaining it and selling it becomes no small matter, especially if it has some unpopular elements (one of Gore’s problems in ‘00). So, those publically well-received visions are either intentionally deceptive (this “vision” will attract people, regardless of its utility), target something that people outside the group of interest don’t think/care about (or those that do, and oppose it, are seen as radicals), or are overly simplistic. No, sir, I base my trust in a politician with a publicized vision. I base it in their history. Self-proclaimed visionaries are usually egotistical liars.

Leave a reply